thirdreturned: (Default)
Sᴏʀʀᴏᴡ ([personal profile] thirdreturned) wrote2016-06-22 05:26 pm

IC Inbox

[Sorrow's voicemail is quiet and stern.]

Leave a message for me and I'll respond when I'm available.

[[ooc: for time sensitive requests, feel free to contact me at [plurk.com profile] raelet for pre-approvals!]]
elegant_and_proud: (focused)

action

[personal profile] elegant_and_proud 2017-09-16 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
Understandable. Preparing for the Null and those who might help them would be a higher priority. I suspect I may not be the only person who pretended to be cooperative in order to gain further information from the Null, but I have no idea who was sincere versus who was pretending.

[Well, she can think of one person who'd be sincere, but she's confident in her ability to talk him down.]

On that topic, how do you plan on handling the matter of people who are sincerely willing to help the Null? Obviously you want to protect yourselves, but being too heavy-handed about the consequences would be unwise.
elegant_and_proud: (smug wink)

action

[personal profile] elegant_and_proud 2017-09-23 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
Oh my, do I detect a glimmer of a sense of humour? I think I may faint from the shock.

[She's amused, either way. At least Sorrow isn't under any delusion about the gods' public relations ratings.]

More seriously, I would suggest revoking their network access, monitoring them, and refusing to transact with them. It may seem tame, but sending them home only reduces the amount of people you can take emotion from and it rewards bad behaviour. Punishing them severely only turns the population against you further, whereas showing mercy when the Null would show none gives you a chance to improve people's perception of you, even if the improvement is only minor.